Today I received an e-mail from my local councillor passing on an
e-mail from a constituent. The
constituent’s e-mail referred to the
Home Office consultation that is currently taking place on same sex
marriage. It said that they didn’t think
it had much publicity and encouraged people, particularly those who had strong views
against same sex marriage, to respond to the consultation. It gave some quote that it appeared to attribute
to the local MP encouraging people to object to the proposals. My councillor encouraged us to circulate the
e-mail to those in our e-mail contact lists.
I was so angry to get that e-mail.
I sat and fumed and tried to decide what to do. I passed a copy to my MP and asked if that
was indeed a quite from him and asked what his views are on the proposals. I also wrote back to my local councillor and
told him that I was very offended to be sent such an e-mail and the
consultation sought views from all, not just those who held strong views. I said that I hoped we lived in a society that
did not discriminate based on race, gender, disability, sexuality or other
irrelevant factor, and that whilst I understood that some, including religious
groups had concerns, the consultation explicitly explained that it excluded such
proposals as same sex marriages being allowed on religious premises. No same sex marriage will be allowed on
religious premises, even if that religious group would like to be able to
conduct such a ceremony.
The councillor wrote back and apologised. Although I am not 100% clear on whether he
was sorry he had offended me or whether he was sorry for the content of the
message.
In an attempt to undo some of the harm done by my councillor
circulating that e-mail, let me encourage you to respond
to the consultation.
It is not acceptable to discriminate against someone based on their
sexuality. It would not be acceptable if
you substituted “race” for “sexuality”.
We live in a society that should be about fairness and equality. Please support the government’s proposals - words
that I never thought I would say given our current government!
2 comments:
I thought it was a gimmick but I did not know that
"individuals will, for the first time, be able legally to change their gender without having to end their marriage"
Hadn't thought of that.. Definitely worth supporting the bill.
Kahless - I hope you're well. Yes, it's a really interesting piece of legislation and covers some really progressive issues. I hope lots of people repond to the consultation who support it.
Post a Comment